Tribunal raises issues over new telecoms code

Posted by LindaStenner on April 11, 2019

Tribunal raises issues over new telecoms code

April 11, 2019 at 10:40 AM

Farmers and landowners negotiating terms with telecoms companies looking to renew sites for masts or apparatus are being advised to seek professional guidance before accepting any offers as a recent tribunal has raised several issues over the new Electronic Communications Code.

The new Electronic Communications Code which came into force in December 2017 contained wide-ranging reforms in favour of operators, with previous enticing rentals being replaced in some cases by derisory offers.

The tribunal case CTIL v Compton Beauchamp Estates Ltd [2019] UKUT 0107 (LC) said 'the evidence presented in future references involving rural property will focus more closely on specific transactions in relevant comparable situations'.

Eifion Bibby of Davis Meade Property Consultants said everyone operating in this sector, including landowners, telecoms firms, land agents and valuers will be advised to be mindful of this guidance.

“The government has been promoting the need for more cost effective telecom sites to boost coverage but since the Code was introduced we have seen extreme examples. For instance one client of mine who previously had been offered £4,650 per annum to host a telecom mast was offered a one-off payment of £32 for 10 years.”

In the tribunal case mentioned, CTIL proposed a single payment of £26 for the rights sought, based on a vacant possession land value of £10,000. 

“As the tribunal observed this did not take into consideration the consequences for a landowner having to give someone full access over their land,” explained Eifion.

The tribunal found force in evidence that many rural landowners have well founded reservations about allowing an operator to have relatively unrestricted access over their land.

Reference was made to “evidence of difficulties which had been experienced in practice owing to breaches of bio-security, operators’ vehicles becoming stranded, or interference with sporting rights”; and  “risk factors of that sort might weigh in the hypothetical parties’ minds when negotiating consideration”.

“We are not persuaded that the tiny sums suggested…take into account the understandable reluctance of rural landowners to lose control of their land to the extent that entry into an agreement for Code rights is likely to entail“.

Mr Bibby said comparable rental evidence for alterative agricultural land use agreements, will no doubt be useful in supporting valuation methodology to establish, by means of market transactions, what may make a landowner a willing small site provider. 

For more advice contact Eifion Bibby at the Colwyn Bay office of Davis Meade Property Consultants on 01492 510360 email eifionbibby@dmpcuk.com

eifion-bibby-mrics-faav.jpg

Tags:

Latest News

Cross Compliance Key Dates and Hedge Cutting Derogation - please see 'Information Tab' for guidance

TESTIMONIALS - Please click here to view all testimonials

Philip Meade has been invited to provide seminars for national training company on rural arbitrations - Date: 11th February 2019 Time: 9.30 to 5.15 Venue: London - For more information please click this link: Rural Arbitrations - An A to Z in One Day

Philip-Meade-MRICS.jpg

Website by InSynch

Oswestry Office, 103 Beatrice Street, Oswestry, Shropshire. SY11 1HL
01691 659658

Colwyn Bay Office, Plas Eirias Business Centre, Abergele Road, Colwyn Bay, Conwy. LL29 8BF
01492 510360

Property Ombudsman